CNN er komið í öngstræti með Falskan Fréttaflutning sinn.

CNN er að vakna upp við vondan draum, Falskar Fréttir þeirra varðandi tengsl Trump og/eða aðstoðarmanna hans við Rússa og rannsóknir þar af lútandi hafa ekki leitt til eins eða neins. Allur fréttatilbúningur CNN og annarra "fréttamiðla" hafa ekki gert neitt annað en að rýra traust almennings á þessum "fréttamiðlum".

Tengsl Trump við Rússa hafa verið til rannsóknar í nærri heilt ár án þess að það hafi leitt til nokkurs, en allt er gert fyrir málstaðinn þ.e. að koma Trump frá völdum. Raunin virðist hinsvegar vera sú að spilling Demókrataflokksins er að verða öllum ljós og sitja umræddir fjölmiðlar uppi með Svarta Pétur.

Ég er hræddur um að fleiri "fréttamenn" eigi eftir að fjúka áður en langt um líður.

CNN er komið í öngstræti með Falskan Fréttaflutning sinn.

Svo er það myndbandið sem afhjúpar "fréttaflutning" CNN. John Bonifield viðurkennir allt á falinni myndavél.

Að CNN skuli kallast fréttamiðill er til háðungar.

Hættu eftir að grein var afturkölluð

Sannleikurinn getur verið sársaukafullur, fyrir suma.

Hverjir ætli finni mest fyrir sársauka við þau sannindi sem hér eru birt???

Dæmi um hvernig CNN og aðrir "frétta" miðlar búa til falskar fréttir

Áhugavert að sjá hvernig hinir svokölluðu "viðurkenndu frétta miðlar" búa til falskar fréttir sem hafa ekkert með sannan fréttaflutning að gera.

Ríki íslams lýsir yfir ábyrgð á árásinni

John R. Bolton fyrrum sendiherra Bandaríkjanna hjá Sameinuðu þjóðunum um ákvörðun Trumps

 

 

Trump að „skjóta sig í fótinn“

Múslímsk kona segir skoðun sína á Ísrael

Sjá myndbandið hér fyrir neðan. Enskur texti fylgir.

Merkel kanslari er ekki öfundsverð

Ekki er Merkel öfundsverð þessa dagana. Það hlýtur að vera erfitt að hafa staðið fyrir því að opna Evrópu fyrir "flótta" fólki og horfa uppá að þetta sama fólk sem hún vildi vernda er nú að ráðast á þýskan almenning til að drepa og eyðileggja innviði ríkis hennar.

Fólkið sem kaus hana og trúði henni fyrir heill þjóðarinnar og að standa vörð um Þýsk gildi og öryggi landsmanna er nú að fá sig fullsatt af gjörðum hennar og aðgerðarleysi.

Þetta síðasta dæmi er ekki hið fyrsta sem hún verður að horfast í augu við og örugglega ekki hið síðasta.

Merkel slegin yfir fréttunum

Var forsætisráðherra Kanada í læri hjá Hillary Clinton?

Líklegt er að Justin Trudeau hafi verið í læri hjá Hillary Clinton. Þau meintu framlög sem JT hefur þegið úr hendi auðmanna er reyndar bara skiptimynt í samanburði við það sem HC fékk.

Clinton leit ekki við smáaurum, menn þurftu að gera vel við hana ættu þeir að ná tali af henni og fengið greiða út á framlögin sem þeir veittu henni. Allt var falt eftir því sem fyrstu tölustafirnir voru hærri í hundruð milljóna dollara framlögunum.

 

Trudeau svari fyrir meinta spillingu

Hvað er að gerast með heimsmarkaðsverð á olíu? Er einhver með puttana í þessu? Af hverju?

Það eru eflaust margir sem velta því fyrir sér hvers vegna olíuverð á heimsmarkaði hefur lækkað eins og raun ber vitni.  Jú, OPEC ríkin hafa ekki komið sér saman um að draga úr framleiðslu eins og þau eru vön að gera þegar þau sjá fram á olíuverðslækkun.  En hvað veldur?  Hverjir hafa hagsmuna að gæta?  Hverjir fara verst út úr lækkuninni?

Í grein GlobalResearch eftir Mike Whitney segir frá því að í september s.l. hafi John Kerry utanríkisráðherra Bandaríkjanna, væntanlega eftir fyrirmælum Obama forseta, farið á fund Abdullah konungs Saudi Arabíu og samið við hann um að setja mikið af ódýrri olíu á markaðinn og þannig verða þess valdandi að olíuverð lækki all verulega.

Tilgangurinn með þessum aðgerðum er að koma höggi á efnahag Rússlands, þar sem Rússar eru háðir olíuútflutningi, en Obama telur sig eiga harma að hefna gegn Pútín sem hann þolir ekki, reyndar er Pútín ekki sá eini sem Obama þolir ekki, en það er önnur saga.

Ég held að Obama geri sér ekki grein fyrir þeirri hættu sem hann er að skapa með þessum aðgerðum.  Obama er búinn að særa björninn stóra í austri og króa hann af úti í horni.  Hvað gera særð dýr sem eru af króuð?  Þau snúast til varna og beita afli og eira engu sem á vegi þeirra verður.  Ætli Obama sér í stríð þá er þetta góð leið til þess að koma því á.  Sjálfsagt vill hann ekki verða sá sem hleypur af fyrsta skotinu svo fólk bendi ekki á hann og segi, "hann byrjaði", en hann ögrar Pútín eins og hann mögulega getur í von um að hann missi sig.

Hvað mun síðan gerast þegar Obama hefur náð sínu fram?  Mun þá olíuverðið ekki fara upp úr öllu valdi?  Ætli Saudar og önnur olíuríki vilji ekki ná aftur þeim fjármunum sem þau telja sig hafa orðið af vegna lækkananna nú?  Fer þá ekki tunnan, sem nú er um USD 60, upp fyrir USD 300 þegar þeir sjá sér færi á að endurheimta "tapaðar" tekjur?  Ég held við getum verið viss um það að sú lækkun sem við höfum séð undanfarið er ekki og verður ekki gefins, hún mun kosta okkur þó síðar verði.

Hér fyrir neðan er vefslóðin á grein Mike Whitney á Global Research.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-oil-coup/5420293

 

Beita Rússa frekari refsiaðgerðum

Hið rétta andlit Obama og Obamacare kemur sífellt betur og betur í ljós!

Obama er strengjabrúða elítunnar.  Á hans embættistíð hafa persónunjósnir margfaldast og er svo komið að ekki er einvörðungu fylgst grannt með Bandarískum þegnum heldur langt út fyrir landamæri BNA.

Obamacare snýst ekki um velferð Bandaríkjamanna, heldur er verið að koma á fullkomnu eftirliti með einstaklingnum, þannig að ríkið getur á augabragði sótt allar þær upplýsingar sem stjórnvöldum dettur í hug um hvern og einn eftir "þörfum".

Obamacare flaug í gegnum þingið þar sem enginn þingmaður nennti að lesa sig í gegn um þær 3000 blaðsíður sem frumvarpið hljóðaði uppá.  Þó reyndu nokkrir repúblikanar að malda í móinn en fengu bágt fyrir.

Michael Connelly, fyrrum lögmaður er var sérhæfður í stjórnarskrár tengdum málum, las sig í gegnum þessar 3000 blaðsíðu lög og var ekki skemmt.  Það er ýmislegt gruggugt sem kemur í ljós við lestur á því sem Mr. Connelly hefur að segja.

Hér fyrir neðan er úrdráttur úr áliti hans á þessum lögum, á ensku.

 Hið rétta andlit Obama og Obamacare kemur sífellt betur og betur í ljós!

The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn’t have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesn’t work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn’t stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea.

This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to “be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution.” If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly (First published in June 2012)
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton, Texas

- See more at: http://www.lindseywilliams.net/#sthash.lktn6Lyz.dpuf

The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn’t have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesn’t work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn’t stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea.

This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to “be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution.” If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly (First published in June 2012)
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton, Texas

The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn’t have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesn’t work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn’t stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea.

This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to “be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution.” If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly (First published in June 2012)
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton, Texas

- See more at: http://www.lindseywilliams.net/#sthash.lktn6Lyz.dpuf

Er dauðvona evran á gjörgæslu komin úr lífshættu????

Ummæli Olli Rehn þess efnis að evran sé komin úr bráðri hættu, minnir óþyrmilega á yfirlýsingar yfirvalda í Grikklandi, Írlandi og víðar þess efnis að þeir muni ekki þurfa á hjálp að halda, svona rétt áður en allt fór í kalda kol hjá þeim.

Evran er sem sagt dauðvona á gjörgæslu, en komin úr lífshættu.  Þannig les ég út úr yfirlýsingu peningamálastjóra Evrópusambandsins.

 

Evran „undir eftirliti og á lyfjagjöf“