Frsluflokkur: Utanrkisml/aljaml

CNN er komi ngstrti me Falskan Frttaflutning sinn.

CNN er a vakna upp vi vondan draum, Falskar Frttir eirra varandi tengsl Trump og/eaastoarmanna hans vi Rssa og rannsknir ar af ltandi hafa ekki leitt til eins ea neins. Allur frttatilbningur CNN og annarra "frttamila" hafa ekki gert neitt anna en a rra traust almennings essum "frttamilum".

Tengsl Trump vi Rssa hafa veri til rannsknar nrri heilt r n ess a a hafi leitt til nokkurs, en allt er gert fyrir mlstainn .e. a koma Trump fr vldum. Raunin virist hinsvegar vera s a spilling Demkrataflokksins er a vera llum ljs og sitja umrddir fjlmilar uppi me Svarta Ptur.

g er hrddur um afleiri "frttamenn" eigi eftir a fjka ur en langt um lur.

CNN er komi ngstrti me Falskan Frttaflutning sinn.

Svo er a myndbandi sem afhjpar "frttaflutning" CNN. John Bonifield viurkennir allt falinni myndavl.

A CNN skuli kallast frttamiill er til hungar.


mbl.is Httu eftir a grein var afturkllu
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Sannleikurinn getur veri srsaukafullur, fyrir suma.

Hverjir tli finni mest fyrir srsauka vi au sannindi sem hr eru birt???


Dmi um hvernig CNN og arir "frtta" milar ba til falskar frttir

hugavert a sjhvernig hinir svoklluu "viurkenndu frtta milar" ba til falskar frttir sem hafa ekkert me sannan frttaflutning a gera.


mbl.is Rki slams lsir yfir byrg rsinni
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Mslmsk kona segir skoun sna srael

Sj myndbandi hr fyrir nean. Enskur texti fylgir.


Merkel kanslari er ekki fundsver

Ekki er Merkel fundsver essa dagana. a hltur a vera erfitt a hafa stai fyrir v a opna Evrpu fyrir "fltta" flki og horfa upp a etta sama flk sem hn vildi vernda er n a rast skan almenning til a drepa og eyileggja innvii rkis hennar.

Flki sem kaus hana og tri henni fyrir heill jarinnar og a standa vr um sk gildi og ryggi landsmanna er n a f sig fullsatt af gjrum hennar og agerarleysi.

etta sasta dmi er ekki hi fyrsta sem hn verur a horfast augu vi og rugglega ekki hi sasta.


mbl.is Merkel slegin yfir frttunum
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Var forstisrherra Kanada lri hj Hillary Clinton?

Lklegt er a Justin Trudeau hafi veri lri hj Hillary Clinton. au meintu framlg sem JT hefur egi r hendi aumanna er reyndar bara skiptimynt samanburi vi a sem HC fkk.

Clinton leit ekki vi smaurum, menn urftu a gera vel vi hana ttu eir a n tali af henni og fengi greia t framlgin sem eir veittu henni. Allt var falt eftir v sem fyrstu tlustafirnir voru hrri hundru milljna dollara framlgunum.


mbl.is Trudeau svari fyrir meinta spillingu
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Hva er a gerast me heimsmarkasver olu? Er einhver me puttana essu? Af hverju?

a eru eflaust margir sem velta v fyrir sr hvers vegna oluver heimsmarkai hefur lkka eins og raun ber vitni. J, OPEC rkin hafa ekki komi sr saman um a draga r framleislu eins og au eru vn a gera egar au sj fram oluverslkkun. En hva veldur? Hverjir hafa hagsmuna a gta? Hverjir fara verst t r lkkuninni?

grein GlobalResearch eftir Mike Whitney segir fr v a september s.l. hafi John Kerry utanrkisrherra Bandarkjanna, vntanlega eftir fyrirmlum Obama forseta, fari fund Abdullahkonungs Saudi Arabu og sami vi hann um a setja miki af drri olu markainn og annig vera ess valdandi a oluver lkki all verulega.

Tilgangurinn me essum agerum er a koma hggi efnahag Rsslands, ar sem Rssar eru hir olutflutningi, en Obama telur sig eiga harma a hefna gegn Ptn sem hann olir ekki, reyndar er Ptn ekki s eini sem Obama olir ekki, en a er nnur saga.

g held a Obama geri sr ekki grein fyrir eirri httu sem hann er a skapa me essum agerum. Obama er binn a sra bjrninn stra austri og kra hann af ti horni. Hva gera sr dr sem eru af kru? au snast til varna og beita afli og eira engu sem vegi eirra verur. tli Obama sr str er etta g lei til ess a koma v . Sjlfsagt vill hann ekki vera s sem hleypur af fyrsta skotinu svo flk bendi ekki hann og segi, "hann byrjai", en hann grar Ptn eins og hann mgulega getur von um a hann missi sig.

Hva mun san gerast egar Obama hefur n snu fram? Mun oluveri ekki fara upp r llu valdi? tli Saudar og nnur olurki vilji ekki n aftur eim fjrmunum sem au telja sig hafa ori af vegnalkkananna n? Fer ekki tunnan, sem n er um USD 60, upp fyrir USD 300 egar eir sj sr fri a endurheimta "tapaar" tekjur? g held vi getum veri viss um a a s lkkun sem vi hfum s undanfari er ekki og verur ekki gefins, hn mun kosta okkur sar veri.

Hr fyrir nean er vefslin grein Mike Whitney Global Research.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-oil-coup/5420293


mbl.is Beita Rssa frekari refsiagerum
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Hi rtta andlit Obama og Obamacare kemur sfellt betur og betur ljs!

Obama er strengjabra eltunnar. hans embttist hafa persnunjsnir margfaldast og er svo komi a ekki er einvrungu fylgst grannt me Bandarskum egnum heldur langt t fyrir landamri BNA.

Obamacare snst ekki um velfer Bandarkjamanna, heldur er veri a koma fullkomnu eftirliti me einstaklingnum, annig a rki getur augabragi stt allar r upplsingar sem stjrnvldum dettur hug um hvern og einn eftir "rfum".

Obamacare flaug gegnum ingi ar sem enginn ingmaur nennti a lesa sig gegn um r 3000 blasur sem frumvarpi hljai upp. reyndu nokkrir repblikanar a malda minn en fengu bgt fyrir.

Michael Connelly, fyrrum lgmaur er var srhfur stjrnarskrr tengdum mlum, las sig gegnum essar 3000 blasu lg og var ekki skemmt. a er mislegt gruggugt sem kemur ljs vi lestur v sem Mr. Connelly hefur a segja.

Hr fyrir nean er rdrttur r liti hans essum lgum, ensku.

Hi rtta andlit Obama og Obamacare kemur sfellt betur og betur ljs!

Say No To The Healthcare Bill

The Truth About the Health Care Bills- Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesnt have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislatedinto oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesnt work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesnt stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea.

This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly (First published in June 2012)
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton, Texas

- See more at: http://www.lindseywilliams.net/#sthash.lktn6Lyz.dpuf

Say No To The Healthcare Bill

The Truth About the Health Care Bills- Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesnt have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislatedinto oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesnt work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesnt stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea.

This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly (First published in June 2012)
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton, Texas

Say No To The Healthcare Bill

The Truth About the Health Care Bills- Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesnt have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislatedinto oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesnt work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesnt stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea.

This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly (First published in June 2012)
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton, Texas

- See more at: http://www.lindseywilliams.net/#sthash.lktn6Lyz.dpuf

Nsta sa

Um bloggi

Tómas Ibsen Halldórsson

Höfundur

Tómas Ibsen Halldórsson
Tómas Ibsen Halldórsson
Er viurkenndur bkari, hef huga jmlum, trmlum og msu ru
gst 2017
S M M F F L
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Njustu myndir

  • A Syrian child

Heimsknir

Flettingar

  • dag (16.8.): 56
  • Sl. slarhring: 57
  • Sl. viku: 79
  • Fr upphafi: 100647

Anna

  • Innlit dag: 53
  • Innlit sl. viku: 76
  • Gestir dag: 52
  • IP-tlur dag: 50

Uppfrt 3 mn. fresti.
Skringar

Innskrning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveiki Javascript til a hefja innskrningu.

Hafu samband